Skip to main content

Facebook to Pay $5 Billion Fine to Settle FTC Privacy Investigation

facebook data privacy ftc investigation
After months of negotiations, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has approved a record $5 billion settlement with Facebook over its privacy investigation into the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

The settlement will put an end to a wide-ranging probe that began more than a year ago and centers around the violation of a 2011 agreement Facebook made with the FTC that required Facebook to gain explicit consent from users to share their personal data.

 The FTC launched an investigation into the social media giant last year after it was revealed that the company allowed Cambridge Analytica access to the personal data of around 87 million Facebook users without their explicit consent.

Now, according to a new report published by the Wall Street Journal, the FTC commissioners this week finally voted to approve a $5 billion settlement, with three Republicans voting to approve the deal and two Democrats against it.

Facebook anticipated the fine to between $3 billion and $5 billion and already had set aside $3 billion for the fine this spring when the company released its first quarter 2019 financial earnings report.

Despite all criticisms Facebook recently faced over its mishandling of users' data, the company's earnings and user base are continually increasing, with Facebook bringing in over $15 billion in revenue for the first quarter of 2019 alone. The social media network also added 39 million daily active users to its platform.

 Though the $5 billion fine amounts to just one month's worth of Facebook's revenue, it is the biggest fine imposed by FTC till the date, far bigger than the $22.5 million fine levied against Google in 2012 for allegedly violating an agreement to improve privacy practices.

"This fine is a fraction of Facebook's annual revenue. It won't make them think twice about their responsibility to protect user data," Representative David Cicilline, a Democrat and chair of a congressional antitrust panel said, calling the penalty "a Christmas present five months early" at Twitter.

"This reported $5 billion penalty is barely a tap on the wrist, not even a slap," Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), a Democrat, said in a statement. "Such a financial punishment for purposeful, blatant illegality is chump change for a company that makes tens of billions of dollars every year."

The FTC has not announced the settlement deal publicly, as the agreement still needs approval from the U.S. Department of Justice.

Not just FTC, UK's Information Commissioner Office (ICO) has also imposed £500,000 (over $628,000) fine on Facebook over the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Site-to-site IPsec VPN with two FortiGates

In this example, you will allow transparent communication between two networks that are located behind different FortiGates at different offices using route-based IPsec VPN. The VPN will be created on both FortiGates by using the VPN Wizard's   Site to Site - FortiGate   template. In this example, one office will be referred to as HQ and the other will be referred to as Branch. 1. Configuring the HQ IPsec VPN On the HQ FortiGate, go to  VPN > IPsec Wizard . Select the  Site to Site  template, and select  FortiGate . In the  Authentication  step, set  IP Address  to the IP of the Branch FortiGate (in the example,  172.20.120.135 ). After you enter the gateway, an available interface will be assigned as the  Outgoing Interface . If you wish to use a different interface, select it from the drop-down menu. Set a secure  Pre-shared Key . In the  Policy & Routing  step, set the  Loca...
Post a Comment
Read more

Be fraud aware - What are phishing, smishing and vishing.

  You may have heard the terms phishing, smishing or vishing before, but what exactly do they mean? At their core, all three terms are a type of financial fraud which tricks unsuspecting victims into giving out sensitive personal information, handing over money or installing malware onto their device. The only difference between each term is the channel via which you can be targeted; phishing refers to scam emails, smishing refers to scam text or WhatsApp messages and vishing takes place over the phone. Phishing The most common phishing method encourages victims to visit a malicious website through a fake email message, which appears to be sent from a legitimate company or source (e.g. from a bank, HMRC, a delivery company or the NHS). For example, you might receive an email which appears to be from an organisation who you’re familiar with, asking you to click on a link. At this point you will be taken to a webpage on which you’re asked to submit sensitive data, such as passwords, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cisco Releases Security Updates for Cisco ASA 5506-X, 5508-X, 5516-X and Firepower// Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvp36425

A vulnerability in the cryptographic driver for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reboot unexpectedly. The vulnerability is due to incomplete input validation of a Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS) ingress packet header. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS/SSL packet to an interface on the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, which will result in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Note:  Only traffic directed to the affected system can be used to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability affects systems configured in routed and transparent firewall mode and in single or multiple context mode. This vulnerability can be triggered by IPv4 and IPv6 traffic. A valid SSL or TLS session is required to exploit this vulnerability. Cisco has...
Post a Comment
Read more